Updates
The JKP Map
The Map
The Vault
← All reports
The JKP Map · Primary source · September 4, 2026

Ideal Living Asked a Federal Judge to Keep Myra Nishizaki From Testifying. The Judge Said No.

In a federal suit over knockoff air filters, AirDoctor and Ideal Living Management moved on September 24, 2025 to block a subpoena for Myra Nishizaki’s deposition. To do it, the company’s lawyers put two things on the record: that all three cases involving her and David Najar were settled together in April 2025 under a confidentiality clause, and that the company had been restructured in July 2025 around an investor its own witness could not name. Two days later the court denied the motion.

AirDoctor, LLC sued Lonni, Inc. and several Chinese companies in January 2023 for selling “replacement” filters for its purifiers. The case has nothing to do with the temple. It became relevant on September 2, 2025, when the defendants served a subpoena on Nishizaki, the company’s former senior brand manager, for a deposition on two topics: the financial and corporate relationship between Ideal Living and its affiliates, and the paragraphs of her own 2023 complaint about the founders’ religious organization. The company’s attempt to stop that deposition is the most candid account it has given of how the cases against her ended and of who owns it now.

ADJUDICATEDMagistrate Judge Alka Sagar’s order of September 26, 2025 denying the protective order, in AirDoctor, LLC v. Lonni, Inc., C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-00353, hosted below.
CONFIRMEDThe company’s statements about the April 2025 settlement and the July 2025 restructuring, the Newsome declaration, Jeremy Sweet’s deposition testimony of September 3, 2025, the September 4, 2025 email about “new parent companies,” the later complaints and counterclaims, and the two recorded security agreements of July 11, 2025 are the filings and public records hosted below.
ASSERTEDThe company’s characterizations of Nishizaki’s allegations as “unfounded” and “false,” and the defendants’ characterizations of the company’s witnesses, are each side’s advocacy. Palm Beach Capital’s July 11, 2025 investment date is its own since-removed web page.
CORROBORATEDThat the “my credit has been destroyed” passage in Reckless Ben’s video is Nishizaki speaking: the on-screen frames, the caption track and a speaker-embedding comparison against each speaker’s confirmed passages agree. What she and Najar say about the cost is their account.
UNRESOLVEDWhether Nishizaki was deposed on September 29, 2025; what the April 2025 settlement paid; and what share of Ideal Living Holdings the July 2025 investor holds.

What the company told the court

The application, filed by AirDoctor’s counsel “for Plaintiff and Non-party Ideal Living Management LLC,” calls Nishizaki’s 2023 suit a lawsuit built on “unfounded allegations” that “the company and its founders were improperly affiliated with a religious ‘cult’ organization engaged in criminal conduct,” and says that “as a consequence of her accusations and actions of her boyfriend, David Najar,” the company and its founders “were forced to file a complaint against Mr. Najar for extortion and harassment.” Then it says how it all ended: “In April 2025, the parties in the Nishizaki Lawsuit, the Najar Lawsuit and the Restraining Order Proceeding reached a settlement agreement, which included a confidentiality provision related to proprietary information stemming from Ms. Nishizaki’s employment with Ideal Living.” The Najar stipulation this site hosts dates that agreement April 7, 2025, thirteen days after a judge ordered Najar to open his finances. The dismissals of June 2025 were the paperwork.

The application’s second argument is that Nishizaki cannot know the company’s current structure because “Plaintiff, Ideal Living and its related companies went through a corporate restructuring in July 2025.” Carlton Newsome, the human-resources manager she sued in 2023, filed a declaration that she was employed “until February 2023” and had signed a confidentiality agreement “in or about June 2011.” The day before filing, counsel had offered the defendants a trade: withdraw the subpoena and the company would produce “an additional 30(b)(6) witness from Plaintiff’s accounting department for a half-day” on its financial and corporate structure.

What its own witness said

The reason that offer was on the table is in the defendants’ opposition. On September 3, 2025, the day after the subpoena, the defendants had deposed Jeremy Sweet, AirDoctor’s designated witness on corporate structure and, by his own description, its director of business and legal affairs. Asked whether Ideal Living Holdings, LLC owns all of Ideal Living, LLC, he answered: “Recently they did have a third-party investor interest, a minority share that now owns a portion of it, I don’t know all the details, but I know there was, in the last -- maybe in July, a new entity that bought in.” Asked the entity’s name: “Hmm, I don’t remember. I’d have to look.” It came in “at the holdings, I think,” and “they created an LLC or two at the holdings level, as well.” The next morning the company’s lawyer wrote to the defendants that “in light of Mr. Sweet’s testimony yesterday that there was a very recent change in Plaintiff’s corporate structure, Plaintiff seeks to file a Second Amended Complaint to add the new parent companies as Plaintiffs.”

The defendants’ lawyer told the court that Sweet “repudiated his own sworn RFA answers, stating that he was told to answer them that way,” and that the company’s witnesses could not explain “the corporate relationship between Plaintiff and its broad range of affiliates.” The court granted leave to amend on October 20, 2025. The Second Amended Complaint of October 24 and the Third Amended Complaint of December 10, 2025 name one plaintiff, AirDoctor, LLC. The new parent companies were never added. The defendants’ amended counterclaims of December 10, 2025 name, as counter-defendants, AirDoctor, Ideal Living, LLC, Response Products, LLC doing business as Ideal Living Direct, Ideal Living Management LLC, and “Ideal Living Holdings, LLC,” which they plead is “the parent company of Ideal Living Management, LLC and AirDoctor.”

The ruling

On September 26, 2025, Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar denied the application in chambers. The company had shown no irreparable prejudice, had “waited almost three weeks after the subpoena was issued,” lacked standing to quash a subpoena to a third party, and “failed to make any credible showing that the information sought from the witness is privileged and/or why the protective order issued in this case cannot safeguard the dissemination of information that is confidential.” The deposition was set for September 29, 2025. Whether it went forward is not in the free record; the entries that would say are behind the court’s paywall.

What the restructuring was

Sweet could not name the entity. The public record can describe the transaction. On July 11, 2025, five Delaware companies, Ideal Living, LLC, AirDoctor, LLC, Aqua Tru, LLC, Ionic Pro, LLC and Therabotanics, LLC, granted JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., “as Administrative Agent for the Secured Parties,” a security interest in every trademark and patent they own, forty-four marks and forty-three patents, under “a Credit Agreement dated as of July 11, 2025” whose borrower is a company formed sixteen days earlier, Ideal Living Intermediate II, LLC. Peter Spiegel signed every grant as “Co-Chief Executive Officer and Co-President.” Katie Williams appears on none of them. Palm Beach Capital, a West Palm Beach private-equity firm, listed Ideal Living on its portfolio page with “Date of Investment: 07/11/2025”; the page has since been taken down, and its managing partner’s biography now names Ideal Living among his board seats. The company’s own witness calls the stake a minority share. Nothing public says how large it is, or how much the founders were paid.

What is left

Two things the company would rather have kept out of a filter case are now in one. The three proceedings that ended the whistleblower’s and Najar’s cases were one settlement, in April 2025, with a confidentiality clause. And the company that sued Najar for threatening to expose “the true ownership and control” of Ideal Living was, by the summer of 2025, unable to tell a federal court who its new owner was.

What the settlement cost the other side is on the record too, in her words. In Reckless Ben’s video of August 27, 2026, at 10:28, Nishizaki says: “My credit has been destroyed. My car was repossessed last month. I have nothing. I’m working multiple jobs and I can’t keep up with the debt, because I took on a lot of debt to try to survive this.” Earlier in the same video she says, “We didn’t have money to fight back. So, they bullied us,” and Najar describes a neutral telling the two of them, “The legal system is not fair. It’s based on money. And I see billions of dollars in that room and I don’t see billions of dollars in this room. Just get out of it.” Some accounts of the video attribute the credit and car lines to Najar; a voice comparison against each speaker’s other passages in the same video puts them in Nishizaki’s voice.

From the federal court file and the patent and trademark office, hosted here, no paywall
PDFEx parte application for a protective order re subpoena to Myra NishizakiFiled Sep 24, 2025 · 12 pp · Doc. 183-1 · the April 2025 settlement and the July 2025 restructuring, in the company’s wordsPDFDeclaration of Carlton NewsomeFiled Sep 24, 2025 · 3 pp · Doc. 183-2PDFDefendants’ opposition to the ex parte applicationFiled Sep 25, 2025 · 19 pp · Doc. 186PDFDeposition of Jeremy Sweet, September 3, 2025, pages 11 to 13Filed Sep 25, 2025 · 5 pp · Doc. 186-3 · “a new entity that bought in”PDFEmail from AirDoctor’s counsel, September 4, 2025Filed Sep 25, 2025 · 2 pp · Doc. 186-4 · “to add the new parent companies as Plaintiffs”PDFOrder denying the ex parte application, Magistrate Judge Alka SagarSep 26, 2025 · 2 pp · Doc. 188PDFDefendants’ amended counterclaimsFiled Dec 10, 2025 · 36 pp · Doc. 248 · names Ideal Living Holdings, LLC as parentPDFConfirmatory grant of security interest in trademarks to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Recorded Jul 11, 2025 · reel 8933, frame 0302 · the July 11, 2025 Credit Agreement; Spiegel as Co-CEO and Co-PresidentPDFGrant of security interest in patents to JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A.Recorded Jul 11, 2025 · reel 71683, frame 0484
In fairness, both directions. The filter case is a dispute between competitors, and each side’s description of the other’s witnesses and claims is advocacy. A corporate designee’s uncertainty about a transaction weeks old is not evidence of anything but uncertainty. Taking on an investor and a lender is ordinary; so is a confidential settlement. Ideal Living Management, Carlton Newsome and Jeremy Sweet are presumed to have acted lawfully, and nothing here is a finding by any court about the temple.

Sources. The nine documents above; the docket of AirDoctor, LLC v. Lonni, Inc., C.D. Cal. No. 2:23-cv-00353-GW-AS, via the RECAP archive; the Delaware Division of Corporations for Ideal Living Intermediate II, LLC (formed June 25, 2025); Palm Beach Capital’s portfolio page as captured June 18, 2026 and its team page as of August 31, 2026; the Najar settlement stipulation hosted in The Record Does Not Need the Witnesses. Every hosted document is indexed in the evidence vault.

← Seventeen Sites Bury the Conviction. Their Admin Accounts Are Ideal Living’s Own Email Addresses.All reports

The JKP Map is independent reporting on matters of public concern. The only criminal conviction referenced anywhere on this site is that of Prakashanand Saraswati; every other person named, on every side of every suit, is presumed to have acted lawfully.  ·  Home · Reports · The Map · The Vault

Supported by The BAM Map